Business Essays Human Resource Strategic

Business Essays valet de chambre Resource Strategic homo Resource StrategicAssignmentTheoretical, Conceptual and Empirical Developments in the line of products of Strategic benignant Resource counselingAbstractThis essay go proscribed discuss the theoretical, standardual and empirical development in the athletic field of strategical benignant option trouble. It is found that the sen quantifynt of beat disclose- become and outgo- exerts has been popular in the amplification of SHRM. The best-fit develop of thought argued that HR dodge bequeath be much than eventive when it is appropriately integrated with its specific constitutional and environmental background.Whereas, the best practices civilize of thought favours universalism, arguing that solely starchys will be mitigate off if they identify and adopt best-practice in the mood they manage deal. However, in last 20 years, the p touchence-based collect of the unassailable has played a opposite section in the theoretical and conceptual developments in the field of SHRM.The vision-based view of the firm put emphasis on the internal preferences of the firm as the source of continue emulous proceeds. These all ideas switch pregnant role in the amplification of SHRM field. Further, integration of SHRM ideas and concepts in Nipponese MNEs operational in USA, Russia, UK, mainland China and Taiwan has been check overd.IntroductionIn this era of globalisation and penetrative competition firms argon seeking ways to continuously gain agonistic advantage, flexibleness and be innovative. It has been argued in literature that efficient and effective homosexual resources polices and practices play pivotal role in gaining this competitory advantage and therefore, much emphasis is now on linking organisational strategies to world resource strategies. Strategic charitable resource counsel (SHRM) has its nucleotide in the US in 1980s in the proceeding of the Harvard Gro up (Beer et al., 1984 cited in moor and Lynda, 1994) and the Michigan/Columbia Group (Fomburn et al., 1984 cited in Truss and Lynda, 1994).Before act notwithstanding to explore the developments in the field of SHRM, some various definitions in the literature which describe the concept of strategic human resource management argon as followTruss and Gratton (1994) states that SHRM is linking of HRM with strategic goals and objectives of firm to stir business exertion and to develop organisational culture that support innovation and flexibility.Schular and carriage (1970, cited in Truss and Lynda, 1994) states that, human resource schema is a redress of attend toes and activities jointly sh atomic number 18d by human resource and line managers to resolve lot-related business sequels.Wright and McMahan (1992, cited in Wright, 1998) defined SHRM is the pattern of planned human resource deployments and activities intended to enable the firm to discoer its goals.In the view of higher up definitions, strategic human resource management therefore, takes a macro-level spatial relation (Truss and Lynda, 1994) and contains thr single of debate in the literature for the factors influencing the development and implementation of the field of SHRM.Best-fit school of thoughtThe best-fit school of thought argues that HR dodging will be more effective when it is appropriately integrated with its specific organizational (Horizontal fit) and environmental (Vertical fit) context (Boxall and Purcell, 2000 Wright and McMahan, 1992 cited in Wright, 1998). However, the review of literature reveals that this fit keister be better strived when certain contingency, configurational and contextual factors are taken into account. securities industryn-Alcazar, Romero-Fernandez and Sanchez-Gardey, (2005) grant grouped the contingency relationships into three generic categories strategic, organizational and environmental variables. They pointed out that the HR practices that are effectively unifiedd (fit) into business strategy would yield high organizational performance (Niniger, 1980 Fombrun et al., 1984 Hax, 1985 Van de Ven and Drazin, 1985 Kerr, 1985 Slocum et al., 1985 Lengnick-Hall and Lengnick-Hall, 1988 Rhodes, 1988a, 1988b Miller, 1989 Kerr and Jackofsky, 1989 Butler et al., 1991 Cappelli and Singh, 1992 Begin, 1993 cited in groceryn-Alcazar et al., 2005).Further, organizational variable such as size, technology, structure (Jones, 1984 enceinte of Mississippi et al., 1989 Jackson and Schuler, 1995 cited in Martn-Alcazar et al., 2005), internal political relationships (Jones, 1984 Pfeffer and Cohen, 1984 Pfeffer and Langton, 1988 Pfeffer and Davis-Blake, 1987 Balkin and Bannister, 1993, Pfeffer, 1987 cited in Martn-Alcazar et al., 2005) and environmental variables such as competition, technological convinces, macro-economics and labour (Kanter, 1983, 1989 Warner, 1984 Coates, 1987 Walker, 1988 Schuler and Walker, 1990 Becker and Gerha rt, 1996 Boxall, 1998 Jackson and Schuler, cited in Martn-Alcazar et al., 2005), all have influence of HR on organizational strategy.The author further indicated that demeanoral theory and resources and capabilities view of the firm value the development of contingency mystifys. Boxall and Purcell (2000) also elaborated this argument by pointing out that the more realistic model for practice is one in which fit with existing hawkish strategy is developed in accordance with flexibility in the range of skill and behaviours, that have the potential to cope with question and different war-ridden scenarios in the future and therefore, HR strategy should incorporate firms current competitive goals and objectives, by recruiting and motivating large number with the sort of skills and motivations required in firms competitive sector.In this regard, Guest (1997 cited in Tekeuchi et al., 2003) argued that effective and efficient alignment of HRM practices is able to transmit out the sy nergistic effects on performance, he referred it fit-as-bundle approach. The atomic number 42 approach which he identified for gaining higher organizational performance done HR is what he called the fit-as-gestalt. The underlying concept of this approach is that, sum of individualistic HR practices is greater than it parts, the pattern of gangs among HRM practices is additive rather multiplicative and that one key aspect of HRM practice is needed.This argument favours, what SHRM interrogationer called configuration perspective. According to configuration theory, a firm seeking high performance have to structure social unit HRM practices and link each practice to all the others in a systematic manner, so that the system is internally pertinacious (Tekeuchi et al., 2003 Martn-Alcazar et al., 2005). Whereas the contextual theory authors argued, that to better understand the knottyity of the concept of SHRM, one should not only scrutinize the internal working and its effect on b usiness performance but rather also rent the influence on the external and organizational context in which managerial decision are made (Brewster, 1999 cited Martn-Alcazar et al., 2005). Therefore, the underlying idea of contextual approach is to effectively examine the relationship in the midst of the SHRM system and its context (Martn-Alcazar et al., 2005).In nutshell, Boxall and Purcell (2000) argued that the best-fit model is one in which HR strategy becomes more effective when it is designed to fit certain critical contingencies in the firms specific context. They proposed that configurational models are more capable of identifying the complex interactions involved in business strategy and toward more dynamic theory.Best-Practices school of thoughtThis school of thought favours universalism, arguing that all firms will achieve high performance, if they identify and adopt best-practice in the way they manage hoi polloi (Boxall and Purcell, 2000). It is fill outd that the con cept of best practices is widely ac fellowshipd by lookers and practitioners (Delery and Doty 1996, 806 cited in Boxall and Purcell, 2000) and there is immense list of argument in the favour of best practices in the literature.Wright, Snell and Dyer (2005) reported that the development of the idea of best-practices came in the mid-1990s when Huselid (1995 cited in Wright et al., 2005) create his study demonstrating a statistically and practically signifi seatt relationship mingled with HRM practices and corporate performance. It was also when MacDuffies (1995 cited in Wright et al., 2005) industry-focused study illustrated how particular bundles of HR practices, when aligned inwardly an organizational strategy leads to high plant-level performance.Since then, the focus of look into is on determination relationship mingled with HRM principles and practices and important organizational goals (Becker and Gerhart, 1996 cited in Wright et al., 2005). Jeffrey Pfeffer (1998 cited in Boxall and Purcell, 2000) identified seven best practicesEmployment security.Selective educational activity.Self-managed team up or team working.High pay contingent on play along performance.Extensive training.Reduction of status differences.Sharing information.However the best practices idea is not short of criticism as Wright et al. (2005) pointed out that intimately of these developments have come from communities of scholars focusing on their own particular countries or regions, be it the US (e.g. Arthur, 1994 Batt, 1999 Delery and Doty, 1996 Huselid et al., 1997 Youndt et al., 1996 cited in cited in Wright et al., 2005), the UK (e.g. Brewster, 1999 Guest, 1997 Guest et al., 2003 Tyson, 1997 cited in cited in Wright et al., 2005), elsewhere in Europe (e.g. dArcimoles, 1997 Lahteenmaki et al., 1998 Rodrguez and Ventura, 2003 cited in cited in Wright et al., 2005) or Asia (e.g. Bae and Lawler, 2000 leeward and Chee, 1996 Lee and Miller, 1999 cited in Wright et al., 2005).SHRM and Resource-based view of the firmAnother, theoretical development in strategic human resource management is its integration with the resource-based view of the firm. Although the field of SHRM does not directly emerge from resource-based view (RBV) of the firm, but to borrow concepts and theories from the broader strategy literature, the integration of the RBV of the firm into the SHRM literature was imminent (Wright et al., 2001).Therefore, two major developments have emerged over the past years. Firstly, the popularity of the RBV at bottom the SHRM literature as a foundation for both theoretical and empirical examination (McMahan, Virick and Wright, 1999 cited in Wright et al., 2001). Secondly, the application and implications of the RBV within the strategy literature have led to an increasing convergence betwixt the field of strategic management and SHRM (Snell, Shadar Wright, 2001 cited in Wright et al., 2001).The RBV proposes that internal organizational resources that ar e expensive, rare, inimitable, and non-substitutable are a source of sustainable competitive advantage (Barney, 1991). Barney (1991) further argued that firms resources can be imperfectly imitable for three reasonshistoric condition (Path dependency) As firm evolve they obtain skills, abilities and resources over the uttermost of time that then become unique to the firm (Barney 1995 cited in Paauwe and Boselie, 2003). Paauwe and Boselie (2003) argued that this is as true for firms human resources who are recruited and trained over the time to be properly embedded in firms cultural network.Causal ambiguity Causal ambiguity exits when the relationship among firms resources and competitive advantage is not understood or imperfectly understood by the firm who posses the competitive advantage and most importantly by the competitors . Paauwe and Boselie (2003) argued that the ways employees competencies have been formed are subject to thousands of small decision and events in the firm s which have contributed to specific pattern of capabilities and hence these patterns are no easily understood by the competitors. companionable Complexity And finally firms resources are imperfectly imitable because they are subject to very complex social phenomena that are beyond the top executive of the firms to systematically manage and influence. So when the competitive advantage is based on such complex social phenomena then the ability of other firms to come after these resources is ceased (Barney, 1991). Paauwe and Boselie (2003) pointed out that social complexity exits in HR characteristics such teamwork, interpersonal relationships among managers, cultural traditions, and firms networks.Wright et al. (1994 cited in Wright et al., 2001) separate firms human resources and HR practices. In applying the concept of value, rareness, inimitable and non-substitutability, they argued that HR practices cannot be the source of firms sustainable competitive advantage as HR practices can easily be copied by competitors. Rather they voted in the favour of human majuscule kitty (a extremely skilled and highly motivated workforce) as source of sustainable competitive advantage for the firm. They celebrated that to gain a source of competitive advantage, the human large(p) pool must have both high level of skill and willingness (i.e. motivation) to picture productive behaviour.Opposingly, Lado and Wilson (1994 cited in Wright et al., 2001) argued that HR practices could allow for the source of sustainable competitive advantage. There point of view is that HR systems can be unique, causally ambiguous and synergistic in how they enhance firm competencies, and therefore could be inimitable. Snell et al. (1996 cited in cited in Wright et al., 2001) further justify Lado and Wilson point of view and see it as widely accepted in current SHRM paradigm.Boxall (cited in Wright, 1998) indicates the process through and through which benignant Resource Advantage (HRA) c an be developed. He argues that HRA consists of two components homosexual resource capital advantage which may provide advantage when firm employs people with higher level of skill than their competitors.Human resource process advantage which can be gain when employees relationships and joint problem solving process enable the firm to execute trading operations more quickly, efficiently and/or effectively.Furthermore, Lepak and Snell (1999 cited in Wright et al., 2001) argued that some employees groups are more instrumental to competitive advantage than others, so they are likely to be managed differently. This may help interrogationers to recognize that real and valid difference exists in HR practices in organisations and numbering for one HR strategy may not help to identify the important differences in the types of human capital available to the firm (cf. Truss Gratton, 1994 cited in Wright et al., 2001).Researchers also have consensus that employee behaviour is an importan t independent component of SHRM. Unlike, the skills of human capital pool, employee behaviour recognize individuals as cognitive and emotional beings who posses free will and this free will enables the employees to make decisions regarding the behaviour in which they are engage (Wright et al., 2001). MacDuffie (1995 cited in Wright et al., 2001) argued most discretionary behaviour that recognizes that within prescribed organisational roles, employees exhibit discretion that may have corroboratory or negative strike on the firm.Similarly, b read and Simon (1958 cited in Wright et al., 2001) recognizes the discretionary behaviour and suggest that competitive advantage can only be gained if the members of human capital pool individually or collectively choose to engage in behaviour that benefits the firm.Based on the above discussion Wright et al. (2001) provide a preliminary framework that suggests perfume competence, dynamic capabilities, and knowledge serve as a bridge between the emphasis in the strategy literature on who provides sources of competitive advantage and the focus in the HRM literature on the process of attraction, development, motivation, and retention of people.The authors pointed out that the people management systems construct which is actually the focus on HR field that creates value to the extent that they impact the stock, flow, and change of intellectual capital/knowledge that form the basis of core competencies. They further argued in this model that, skill concept should be looked from the broader perspective of the firm strategy and therefore, might be expanded to consider the stock of intellectual capital in the firm, embedded in both people and systems, this stock of human capital consists of human (knowledge, skills, and abilities of the people) social (the valuable relationships among people), and organisational (processes and routines within the firm).The behaviour element within the SHRM literature has been embedded in the flow of knowledge within the firm through its creation, transfer, and integration. The authors have indicated that, this knowledge management behaviour becomes very important as information and knowledge play greater role in firm competitive advantage. It is through the flow of knowledge that firms increase or maintain the stock of intellectual capital.They further propose that core competencies arises from the combination of the firms stock of knowledge (human, social, and organisational capital embedded in both people and systems) and flow of this knowledge through creation, transfer, and integration in a way that is valuable, rare, inimitable, and organized. Finally, the dynamic capability construct represents the processes that the organisation has to cope with, in order to remain competitive.It illustrates the relationship between the workforce and the core competence as it changes overtime. The authors argued that dynamic capability requires changing competencies on the part of both the organization and the people who comprise it. It is facilitated by people management systems that promote the change of both the stock and flow of knowledge within the firm that enable a firm to constantly renew its core competencies.This frame work developed by Wright et al. (2001) is an important development in SHRM literature merely its application in real world scenario is subject to empirical testing.SHRM in Japanese Multinational in USA, Russia, UK, China and TaiwanTo further investigate the issue in the real world scenario, this essay will look into the matter of SHRM integration in Japanese multinational companies operating in USA, UK, Russia, China and Taiwan. This discussion is based on the empirical research conducted by Park, Mitsuhashi, Fey and Bjorkman (2003) on fifty two Japanese multinational sight operating in USA and Russia, Basu and Miroshnik (1999) case study of Nisan and Toyota (Japanese automobile companies) operating in UK and Takeuchi, Wakabayash i and Chen (2003) study of 286 Japanese affiliates operating in Mainland China and Taiwan.Japanese manufacturing organisations have made a lot of inroads in foreign production bases. The successes of their enterprises have raised interests on the system of production and organisation peculiar to the Japanese business firms (Wickens, 1987 Suzaki, 1987 cited in Basu and Miroshnik, 1999). Japanese system of management is a complete philosophy of organisation which can affect all(prenominal) part of the enterprise (Ohno, 1978 Nohara, 1985 cited in Basu and Miroshnik, 1999).The empirical research done by the authors, mentioned above to investigate the issue of HRM strategy and firm performance in Japanese MNEs is subject to the idea of best HR practices. However, some evoke facts come into attention with the previous discussion of best-fit, best-practices and resource-based view of the firm which would be discussed below.The Japanese MNEs have maintained their own management styles in oversea operations and despite of cultural difference, environment impact, and local labour market conditions these MNEs have adopted the best practices idea and tried to coordinate the HRM policies and practices between their overseas subsidiaries and parent headquarters.The Japanese philosophy of continuous improvement, zero defect, just-in-time order of delivery, team based problem solving practices (Quality circles, management by objectives, kaizen (suggestion and improvement)), long-term inscription, in-company wellbeing system, extensive training for skill development, performance based rewards, deconcentrate responsibilities, vertical information systems are at the heart of their management strategy . And this style of management has not only proved to be favored for Japanese MNEs but it has forced other local companies to adopt Japanese styles of management for increased organizational performance.The concept of team working through tone circles and management by obj ectives (MBO) are the important components to manage the human resources of the firm and bring them in align with company strategic goals to achieve higher performance. Employees through quality circle teams can put transport their suggestions, and then feedback is given to employees for their suggestion and there are also rewards for employees.This cherish employees motivation and give them the sense of involvement. It does not only ends here, as the concept of quality circle is also important for organizational learning, as the members of quality circle comes from every department of the organization and share their knowledge and information, this helps in creating new skills and attitudes that can help to attain the company goals. home in defect policy refers to the fact that instead of individual parts the whole process is controlled and quality is insured through process instead of inspection. Therefore, employees are given extensive on the job and off the job training not on ly for specific but rather multiple operations of the firm. This refers to the fact of upskilling of employees.The long term commitment and performance based rewards helps to vouch employee retention and continuous commitment towards the firms objectives, this refers to the fact that the valuable and rare skills of the employees that have been developed over the period of time and are integrated into firms HR systems should not be imitable and substitutable.The above discussion points out, that these Japanese MNEs HR systems are some what in coherence with the framework developed by Wright et al. (2001). As it is obvious from above discussion that the people management systems of Japanese overseas subsidiaries are continuously maintaining their stock of intellectual capital both embedded in people and systems of the company i.e. through extensive training, performance based rewards, concept of continuous improvement etc.And the concept of team working through quality circles and MB O is fostering learning in Japanese organization and this valuable knowledge and skills that employees developed is retained by the policy of long-term commitment and in-company welfare system,decentralised responsibilitieswhich all help to develop employees behaviour and attitudes for high commitment and hence increased organizational performance. It is also observed that these patterns of HR practice is quite relevant to our earlier discussion of best practices in which we refer to the seven practices identified by Jeffrey Pfeffer (1998 cited in Wright et al., 2001).ConclusionThe empirical research done in the field of SHRM to investigate the issue of strategic HRM and its impact on performance of Japanese MNEs is only based on finding relationship between HR practices (configurational perspective) of the firm and their impact on organizational performance. The concepts of dynamic capabilities, core competencies, organizational learning are gaining popularity in strategic literatu re and as argued by Wright et al., 2001 are the important source of gaining sustained competitive advantage.Therefore, the future empirical research should incorporate these concepts to investigate the issue of integration of HR into firms strategy. Secondly the above research also lack the evidence of how these Japanese MNEs incorporate the local market, political science regulations, cultural impact that can have influence on HR strategies of these firms.In the view of above theoretical developments in the literature it can be proposed that the firms who seek high performance and want to gain competitive edge over their competitors should device their HR policies and practices that develop skills, attitudes and behaviours of the employees in such a way that are valuable, rare, imperfectly imitable and non-substitutable in the firms same line of business, organizational learning is an important component in developing up these characteristics and therefore, firms should develop up knowledge management systems embodied into their HR strategy to foster organizational learning that would have positive impact on firms performance.ReferencesBarney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. ledger of solicitude. 17, 1, 99-120.Basu, D.R. and Miroshnik, V. (1999). Strategic human resource management of Japanese multinationals A case study of Japanese multinational companies in the UK. The daybook of Management Development. 18, 9, 714-732.Boxall, P. and Purcell, J. (2000). Strategic human resource management where have we come from and where should we be going?. International Journal of Management Reviews. 2, 2, 183-203.Martn-Alcazar, F., Romero-Fernandez, P.M. and Sanchez-Gardey, G. (2005). Strategic human resource management integrating the universalistic, contingent, configurational and contextual perspectives. The International Journal of Human Resource Management. 16, 5, 633-659.Paauwe, J. and Boselie, P. (2003). Challenging strategic HRM and the relevance of the institutional setting. Human Resource Management Journal. 13, 3, 56-70.Park, H.J., Mitsuhashi, H., Fey, C.F. and Bjorkman, I. (2003). The effect of human resource management practices on Japanese MNC subsidiary performance a partial mediating model. The International Journal of Human Resource Management. 14, 8,1391-1406.Takeuchi, N., Wakabayashi, M. and Chen, Z. (2003). The strategic HRM configuration for competitive advantage indorse from Japanese firms in China and Taiwan. Asia Pacific Journal of Management. 20, 4, 447-480.Truss, C. and Gratton, L. (1994). Strategic human resource management a conceptual approach. The International Journal of Human Resource Management. 5, 3, 663-686.Wright, P.M. (1998). Introduction Strategic human resource management research in the 21st century. Human Resource Management Review. 8, 3, 187-191.Wright, P., Dunford, B. and Snell, S. (2001). Human resources and the resource based view of the firm. Journal of Management. 27 , 6, 701 -721.Wright, P.M., Snell, S.A. and Dyer, L. (2005). New models of strategic HRM in a global context. The International Journal of Human Resource Management. 16, 6,875-881.BibliographyLepak, D.P. and Snell, S.A. (1998). Virtual HR Strategic human resource management in 21st century. Human Resource Management Review. 8, 3, 215-234.Lundy, O. (1994). From personnel management to strategic human resource management. The International Journal of Human Resource Management. 5, 3, 687-720.Mabey, C., Salaman, G. and Storey, J. (1998). Human Resource Management A Strategic Introduction (2nd Edition). Massachusetts Blackwell Publishers Inc.