Wednesday, May 29, 2019

Cloning Essay -- essays research papers fc

With the technological familiarity in the gentleman ripening from daylight to day, there is no way to predict where science may lead us in the in store(predicate). Just a few years ago, copy was something of a fictional nature that most scientists had thought about, but never seriously considered it as an experiment. Recently, animals have been knockoffd, and re-create has become no less than straightforward reality. In a few more years, the knowledge on how to clon existence could be present. forrader that advancement arrives, we need to ask ourselves if this knowledge of re-create is a beneficial idea or a destructive angiotensin converting enzyme. Cloning lead have negative effects on our society in the future because re-create de nurses uniqueness of the individual cloned, clones could be used in crimes or used as weapons, cloned animals that are reintroduced into the ecosystem could cause the ecosystem to change drastically, people who try to clone their absolu tely loved ones will be shocked to find that the clone may resemble the person that they love, but it really isnt the person that they love, finally, animals that are cloned for medical examination reasons dont deserve to be brought into this world just to be used only for their organs and other body parts. If something isnt done to avoid cloning humans onwards it is as well late, hence cloning could upset the balance of our society drastically, possibly causing irreversible mishap in the world as we know it today. The knowledge on how to clone humans doesnt exist yet, but the knowledge on how to clone animals is presently being utilized in research labs worldwide. Standard cloning involves victorious DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) from a cell of a particular species and transferring it into an egg cell from another animal belonging to the same species or another one. Before this offshoot stinker take place, the nucleus from the original cell must be removed from that egg. The re sult is then implanted into the surrogate mother. This mother will then provide the food and nutrients for the embryo to develop until the mother gives birth to the clone. Until recently, the surrogate mother had to be of the same species, but now, with recent technological advances, one species can now give birth to a different species (" intuition and Technology" 100). The laundry list of complaints about cloning begins with the fact that cloning humans decreases the value of uniqueness of the individual. Accordi... ...ls." CeresNet 2000.5 Nov. 2000 http//www.ceresnet.org/ViewEntry.cfm?ID=82&Section=outreach Colvin, Jonathon. "Me, my clone, and I (or in defense of human cloning)." The Humanist May/Jun. 2000 39. Dixon, Dr. Patrick. Dont Clone 3 Reasons. 31 Oct. 2000 http//www.globalchange.com/noclones.htm Lemonick, Michael D. "Could a clone ever run for President?" Time 8 Nov. 1999 96. Mayor, Susan. "UK authorities recommend human cloning for th erapeutic research." British Medical Journal 98 1613. Myers, Nichole. ain Interview. 1 April. 2001. Pavone, Fr. Frank. "What does it mean to be Me?" 31 Oct. 2000 http//www.priestsforlife.org/pressreleases/clonepress.html Rembert, Tracey C. "Me and my shadow." E Jul/Aug. 1997 1521. Schaeffer, Pamela. "Many oppose human cloning." National Catholic Reporter 22 Oct. 1999 19,21. "Science and engine room New kid on the block." The Economist 14 Oct. 2000 100. "Vatican No to human cloning." National Catholic Reporter 22 Oct. 1999 21. Watson, Rory. "European parliament wants world toss out on human cloning." British Medical Journal 97 847 Cloning Essay -- essays research papers fc With the technological knowledge in the world growing from day to day, there is no way to predict where science may lead us in the future. Just a few years ago, cloning was something of a fictional nature that most scientists had thought about, but never seriously considered it as an experiment. Recently, animals have been cloned, and cloning has become no less than true reality. In a few more years, the knowledge on how to clone humans could be present. Before that advancement arrives, we need to ask ourselves if this knowledge of cloning is a beneficial idea or a destructive one. Cloning will have negative effects on our society in the future because cloning devalues uniqueness of the individual cloned, clones could be used in crimes or used as weapons, cloned animals that are reintroduced into the ecosystem could cause the ecosystem to change drastically, people who try to clone their dead loved ones will be shocked to find that the clone may resemble the person that they love, but it really isnt the person that they love, finally, animals that are cloned for medical reasons dont deserve to be brought into this world just to be used only for their organs and other body parts. If something isnt done to avoid cloning hum ans before it is too late, then cloning could upset the balance of our society drastically, possibly causing irreversible mishap in the world as we know it today. The knowledge on how to clone humans doesnt exist yet, but the knowledge on how to clone animals is presently being utilized in research labs worldwide. Standard cloning involves taking DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) from a cell of a particular species and transferring it into an egg cell from another animal belonging to the same species or another one. Before this process can take place, the nucleus from the original cell must be removed from that egg. The result is then implanted into the surrogate mother. This mother will then provide the food and nutrients for the embryo to develop until the mother gives birth to the clone. Until recently, the surrogate mother had to be of the same species, but now, with recent technological advances, one species can now give birth to a different species ("Science and Technology" 100). The laundry list of complaints about cloning begins with the fact that cloning humans decreases the value of uniqueness of the individual. Accordi... ...ls." CeresNet 2000.5 Nov. 2000 http//www.ceresnet.org/ViewEntry.cfm?ID=82&Section=outreach Colvin, Jonathon. "Me, my clone, and I (or in defense of human cloning)." The Humanist May/Jun. 2000 39. Dixon, Dr. Patrick. Dont Clone 3 Reasons. 31 Oct. 2000 http//www.globalchange.com/noclones.htm Lemonick, Michael D. "Could a clone ever run for President?" Time 8 Nov. 1999 96. Mayor, Susan. "UK authorities recommend human cloning for therapeutic research." British Medical Journal 98 1613. Myers, Nichole. Personal Interview. 1 April. 2001. Pavone, Fr. Frank. "What does it mean to be Me?" 31 Oct. 2000 http//www.priestsforlife.org/pressreleases/clonepress.html Rembert, Tracey C. "Me and my shadow." E Jul/Aug. 1997 1521. Schaeffer, Pamela. "Many oppose human cloning." National Cath olic Reporter 22 Oct. 1999 19,21. "Science and technology New kid on the block." The Economist 14 Oct. 2000 100. "Vatican No to human cloning." National Catholic Reporter 22 Oct. 1999 21. Watson, Rory. "European parliament wants world ban on human cloning." British Medical Journal 97 847

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.